Become a Jury

At YESIST12, our esteemed jury panel serves as the backbone of the evaluation process, ensuring that groundbreaking ideas receive the recognition they deserve. Comprising distinguished professionals from academia, industry, and research, our jury brings a wealth of expertise and diverse perspectives to the table. Their role extends beyond evaluation—they mentor, guide, and inspire participants by providing constructive feedback and insights that help refine and elevate innovative solutions. Through a rigorous and transparent assessment process, the jury ensures that every project is evaluated based on its originality, feasibility, impact, and alignment with real-world challenges. Their commitment to fostering innovation and excellence makes IEEE YESIST12 a platform where aspiring innovators can thrive and contribute meaningfully to technological advancements.

Juries 2025

ACHRAF JABEUR TELMOUDI

Professor, the Higher National Engineering School of Tunis, University of Tunis,

Rupal Jain

PMI certified PMP®, Scrum alliance certified CSM®, Program Manager, published author,

Dr. Lenin Raja

Director, EMC Test & Training Center Pvt Ltd

What they get from us

Contribution to Innovation

Support young innovators and shape future technologies by evaluating and guiding promising ideas.

Recognition

Gain acknowledgment as a subject matter expert, often through certificates, mentions, or event publications.

In trend

Stay updated with emerging trends, innovative ideas, and creative solutions across diverse fields.

Networking Opportunities

Connect with other experts, innovators, and industry leaders, broadening your professional network.

Roles and responsibilities

  • Project Evaluation: Assess assigned projects based on the provided evaluation criteria of the track
  • Objective Scoring: Maintain impartiality while assigning scores for each project according to predefined rubrics.
  • Feedback Provision: Offer constructive feedback to participants, highlighting areas of strength and improvement.
  • Confidentiality: Maintain strict confidentiality regarding the project details, results, and evaluation process.
  • Adherence to Timelines: Complete evaluations within the stipulated time frame, ensuring smooth progress of the event.Each jury member will receive two sets, each containing 10 projects. One set must be evaluated within a 10-day timeframe.
  • Active Participation: Attend briefing sessions, evaluation rounds, and deliberation meetings as required.
  • Conflict of Interest Declaration: Disclose any direct involvement with projects or teams to avoid biases in evaluation.
  • Support Decision Finalization: Collaborate with fellow jury members and event organizers in finalizing and validating the results.

1) What are the main tracks in IEEE YESIST12, and what do they entail?

IEEE YESIST12 comprises several tracks:
i. Innovation Challenge: Participants present innovative solutions to current global issues.
ii. Junior Einstein: Aimed at school students, this track encourages young innovators to showcase their projects.
iii. Maker Fair: Focuses on DIY projects and prototypes demonstrating creativity and technical skills.
iv. WePOWER: Empowers women in engineering to present their innovative ideas.
v. Special Track: Covers unique themes or challenges introduced for that particular year.
vi. IEngage: Encourages participants to engage with communities and develop solutions for social betterment.

2) What are the evaluation criteria for each track? (INDIVIDUAL CRITERIA GUIDELINES WILL BE MAILED)

While specific criteria may vary by track, general evaluation parameters include:
i. Innovation and Creativity: Originality of the idea or solution.
ii. Impact: Potential of the project to address the identified problem effectively.
iii. Feasibility: Practicality and viability of implementing the solution.
iv. Presentation: Clarity, coherence, and effectiveness of the project presentation.
v. Technical Proficiency: Demonstrated technical skills and knowledge.

3) How should jurors prepare for the event?

a. Review Submissions: Familiarize yourself with the projects assigned for evaluation.
b. Understand Evaluation Criteria: Ensure clarity on the specific criteria for each track.
c. Attend Briefings: Participate in any pre-event meetings or briefings organized for jurors.

4) What is the expected time commitment for jurors?

The time commitment varies depending on the number of projects assigned and the event's schedule. Jurors should allocate sufficient time for reviewing submissions, attending presentations, and deliberation sessions.

5) Are there any conflict-of-interest guidelines for jurors?

Yes, jurors should disclose any potential conflicts of interest, such as personal or professional relationships with participants, to maintain impartiality.

6) How are scores submitted and processed?

Jurors will receive guidelines on scoring procedures, which may involve digital platforms or physical scorecards. Ensure timely submission of scores as per the provided instructions.

7) Can jurors provide feedback to participants?

Providing constructive feedback is encouraged, as it helps participants improve their projects and fosters a learning environment.

8) What resources are available for jurors to understand the event's themes and objectives better?

Jurors can access resources such as the event's official website, briefing documents, and previous years' project examples to gain insights into the event's goals and expectations.

9) Are there opportunities for jurors to interact with participants outside of evaluations?

Depending on the event's format, there may be networking sessions, workshops, or informal gatherings where jurors can engage with participants.

10) Whom should jurors contact for support or clarification during the event?

Jurors will be provided with contact information for event coordinators or support staff who can assist with any queries or issues that arise during the event.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

Innovation challenge Track:

  1. Project Title
  2. Prototype
  3. Relevance to the theme (20 marks)
  4. Novelty of Idea (20 marks)
  5. Innovation of the idea (20 marks)
  6. Awareness on Standards/ Methodology (20 marks)
  7. Scalability/ Market value (20 marks)

Maker Fair Track:

  1. Theme of the project-
  2. Prototype – Yes ( Mandatory)
  3. Relevance to the Theme- (5 Marks)
  4. Technical Complexity-(15 Marks)
  5. Originality of Idea-(20 Marks)
  6. Implementation Level-(20 Marks)
  7. Awareness on Standards unit-(20 Marks)
  8. Presentation & Question and Answer-(20 Marks)

WePOWER Track:

  1. Project Title
  2. Prototype
  3. Relevance to the theme (20 marks)
  4. Novelty of Idea (20 marks)
  5. Implementation (20 marks)
  6. Community Beneficial (20 marks)
  7. Scalability/ Market value (10 marks)
  8. Presentation (10 marks)

Special Track:

  1. Prototype Model (5 Marks)
  2. Relevance to the Theme (5 Marks)
  3. Technical Complexity (15 Marks)
  4. Novelty of the Idea (20 Marks)
  5. Implementation Level (20 Marks)
  6. Feasibility and Sustainability (20 Marks)
  7. Awareness of IEEE Standards (5 Marks)
  8. Presentation & Q&A (10 Marks)

Junior Einstein track evaluation criteria:

  1. Novelty / Innovation (20)
  2. Understanding of target market/customer needs (20)
  3. Project impact & Scalability (20)
  4. Technical  implementation & demonstration (20)
  5. Clarity of pitch (20)

FAQs

IEEE YESIST12 comprises several tracks: <br>
i. Innovation Challenge: Participants present innovative solutions to current global issues.<br>
ii. Junior Einstein: Aimed at school students, this track encourages young innovators to showcase their projects.<br>
iii. Maker Fair: Focuses on DIY projects and prototypes demonstrating creativity and technical skills.<br>
iv. WePOWER: Empowers women in engineering to present their innovative ideas.<br>
v. Special Track: Covers unique themes or challenges introduced for that particular year.<br>
vi. IEngage: Encourages participants to engage with communities and develop solutions for social betterment.